Enrile versus Trillanes: Who's the faggot?

The recent headline in the senate is another petty debacle of the witties: Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile and Senator Antonio Trillanes IV. While the senate president pointed out that Trillanes did a backdoor job with an alleged negotiation with the Chinese, the latter also accused the senate president of trying to meddle with the division of Camarines Sur into two provinces with a 'shabby decision' and that the presiding senator was a 'bully'. To me, maybe it is normal for senators to point out at each other and try to mitigate into some sort of check and balance among each other, but is it rather healthy for a senate to have two arguing individuals against each other? Well, it is nothing new. We have had enough of this senator 1 and senator 2 against each other before and the only major thing about this new one is that it is against a presiding officer which is the senate president. Let me see a little backgrounder of the two: 

Enrile was a former Marcos ally who was bypassed during the later years of the martial law years. Connected with Philippine Constabuary leader Fidel V. Ramos and Gringo Honasan and so, together with the People Power, they were able to oust the former dictator from position. As far his personal background are concerned, this senator has lots of badges on his chest.

Trillanes is one of the Oakwood Mutiny rogue first class soldiers who ransacked a hotel and intimidated the former administration in front of the world. Although not as heavy as the former, this senator is firm and upfront of telling everybody about who's who in the political arena whoever they maybe.

I only have just one issue to contend with the statement one against the other. If Enrile states who Trillanes was and tries to remind people about the negative side of latter, I say maybe Enrile is right. But, what about the fighting merits of Trillanes and the rest of the Oakwood Mutiny group called Magdalo did was actually in favor of the people, in favor of the Philippines as a whole although what they did was against the rule of law and against the protocol of 'a soldier thingy', as to who they were against and how dirty the government that was run for the previous years was, to me, a very exacting predicament against those who led the Philippine government that time. Arroyo administration? Come on. Don't be silly mister senate president! You did nothing and had nothing positive in terms of exploring the best positive option to counteract against the previous administration.

As for Trillanes IV, yes, he may have had a rogue against the previous administration and the government. Well, maybe for some instance, this guy, as young as he is, may still have to eat a lot of rice in order to grow. But Senator Trillanes must, at all cost, try to explore the best possible options should show the entire Philippines of his best ability to act against anybody without jeopardizing himself along the way. Well, he jeopardized his image when he fell against the trap of 'some unknown individuals' who fetched him from his hearing at a court where he is under oath and walked out against the rule of law from the hearing. He may have a fighting heart to curb out the corrupt and the erring members of the armed forces, his tactics should change because the image that he is trying to portray is already becoming a demise of his own actions.

Now, who's the faggot among the two? With the sad state of the senate nowadays particular the post-Sotto scandal and all those bruhahas? I could not point who among the two but there is no exception among the roster of senators we have at the upper chamber. Maybe Santiago deserves the upper hand among all of them-a lot lesser faggot, to say the least! LOL